CXLVI

"...in regard to "revolutionary" ambitions it is necessary to clear the misunderstandings and to choose between the 2 aforementioned opposing positions, which determine 2 likewise opposing styles. Again, on the one hand there are those who acknowledge the existence of immutable principles for every true order and who abide by them not allowing themselves to be swept along by events. Such people do not believe in "history" and in "progress" as mysterious super ordained entities, but instead attempt to dominate the forces of the environment and lead them back to higher, stable forms: according to them, this is what embracing reality amounts to. on the other hand there are those who, having been "born yesterday," have nothing in the past, who believe only in the future and are committed to a groundless, empirical, and improvised action, deluding themselves that they are able to direct events without knowing or acknowledging anything that rises above the plane of matter and contingency; such people devise many systems, the end result of which will never be an authentic order, but instead a more or less manageable disorder. The "revolutionary" vocation belongs to this second line of thought, even when it does not directly serve the interests of unadulterated subversion. In this context, the lack of principles is supplied with the myth of the future, thought which some dare to justify and sanctify recent destructions that have occurred (WWII), since in their view they were necessary in order to move ahead and to achieve new and better horizons (any trace of which, I am afraid, it is difficult to point out).

Once things are clearly seen in these termns, it is necessary to thoroughly examine one's "revolutionary ambitions, all the while aware that if these ambitions are kept within their legitimate limits, one would then be a part of history's demolition squad. Those who are still standing upright in this world of ruins are at a higher level; their watchword is TRADITION, according to the dynamic aspect I have just made evident. When circumstances change, when crises occur, when new factors come into play, where the previous damns begin to crack, these people know how how to retain their sangfroid and are capable of letting go of what needs to be abandoned in order that what is truly essential may not be compromised. These people know how to move on, upholding in an impassive way the forms that are proper to the new circumstances, knowing how to assert themselves through them; their goal is to reestablish and maintain an immaterial continuity and avoid a groundless and adventurous course of action. This is the method of the true dominators of history, which is very different from a more virile than that of the merely "revolutionary"."

"...if the "Fascist ideas" still deserve to be defended, they should not be defended simply insofar as they are "Fascist", but rather insofar they have represented a particular form of the apparition and affirmation of ideas that were older and more elevated than Fascism, ideas that have the character of "constants", so that they may found again as integral parts of a great European political tradition. To cherish these ideas not according to this spirit, but solely because they are "revolutionary", original, and proper only to Fascism, would amount to belittling them, adopting a limiting perspective and making difficult a much needed task of clarification."

Men among ruins, Chapter I

Julius Evola (1953)

CXLV

"Someday in the future there will be two possible outcomes: either the world will be governed according to the ideas of our modern democracy and the equality of every decision will lie with the more numerous races; or the world will be ruled by the natural laws of relative strength and the people possessing brutal will power will triumph over the nations that have denied themselves what they need to survive. There is no doubt that the world will someday be the scene of huge battles for the existence of mankind. In the end the craving for self preservation alone will triumph. That stupid and cowardly group of humanity that thinks they know more than anyone else will find their humanitarianism melts like snow in the March sun, when they face destruction. In eternal battle, mankind can find greatness; in eternal peace, it will find destruction."


Mein Kampf, Vol I Cap. 4 
AH

CXLIV

‎"The blessings of mankind have never come from the masses, but they have come from the creative minds of the individuals. In the real world these creative minds are the founders and providers of the human race. It is in the best interest of the community to make certain these men have the dominant influence and to assist them in their effort. Unquestionably the interests of the community are not satisfied and not served by the rule of the masses but only by the leadership of those whom nature has equipped with special talent for that purpose. The masses are not experts, the masses do not posses thinking power, and certainly, the masses are not divinely gifted. Only individuals have these powers."


Mein Kampf, Vol II Cap. 4 
AH

CXLIII

Todo el mundo es un personaje detrás de una máscara detrás de un disfraz detrás de una cuenta de facebook...

CXLII

Certainly, economic reasons no longer explain the condition in which the world finds itself today. Neither does the ordinary explanation of "the heartlessness of capital." Capital has endeavored as never before to meet the demands of labor, and labor has gone to extremes in leading capital to new concessions -- but what has it advantaged either of them? Labor has heretofore thought that capital was the sky over it, and it made the sky yield, but behold, there was yet an higher sky which neither capital nor labor had seen in their struggles one with another. That sky is so far unyielding.

That which we call capital here in America is usually money used in production, and we mistakenly refer to the manufacturer, the manager of work, the provider of tools and jobs -- we refer to him as the "capitalist." Oh, no. He is not the capitalist in the real sense. Why, he himself must go to capitalists for the money with which to finance his plans. There is a power yet above him -- a power which treats him far more callously and holds him in a more ruthless hand than he would ever dare display to labor. That, indeed, is one of the tragedies of these times, that "labor" and "capital" are fighting each other, when the conditions against which each one of them protests, and from which each one of them suffers, is not within their power to remedy at all, unless they find a way to wrest world control from that group of international financiers who create and control both these conditions.

There is a super-capitalism which is supported wholly by the fiction that gold is wealth. There is a super-government which is allied to no government, which is free from them all, and yet which has its hand in them all. There is a race, a part of humanity, which has never yet been received as a welcome part, and which has succeeded in raising itself to a power that the proudest Gentile race has never claimed -- not even Rome in the days of her proudest power. It is becoming more and more the conviction of men all over the world that the labor question, the wage question, the land question cannot be settled until first of all this matter of an international super-capitalistic government is settled.

"To the victor belongs the spoils" is an old saying. And in a sense it is true that if all this power of control has been gained and held by a few men of a long-despised race, then either they are super-men whom it is powerless to resist, or they are ordinary men whom the rest of the world has permitted to obtain an undue and unsafe degree of power. Unless the Jews are super-men, the Gentiles will have themselves to blame for what has transpired, and they can look for rectification in a new scrutiny of the situation and a candid examination of the experiences of other countries.

The International Jew Capítulo 1

Henry Ford